首页>海关综合信息资讯>配额许可贸易壁垒>[本文BIG5]2007年最新中国海关税率税则查询表
补贴与反补贴措施协定(英文)18
中国海关综合信息资讯网-海关通关报关咨询/进出口统计数据关税查询
  ANNEX II

GUIDELINES ON CONSUMPTION OF INPUTS IN THE PRODUCTION PROCESS

I

1. Indirect tax rebate schemes can allow for exemption, remission or deferral of prior?stage cumulative indirect taxes levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product (making normal allowance for waste). Similarly, drawback schemes can allow for the remission or drawback of import charges levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product (making normal allowance for waste).

2. The Illustrative List of Export Subsidies in Annex I of this Agreement makes reference to the term "inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product" in paragraphs (h) and (I). Pursuant to paragraph (h), indirect tax rebate schemes can constitute an export subsidy to the extent that they result in exemption, remission or deferral of prior?stage cumulative indirect taxes in excess of the amount of such taxes actually levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product. Pursuant to paragraph (I), drawback schemes can constitute an export subsidy to the extent that they result in a remission or drawback of import charges in excess of those actually levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product. Both paragraphs stipulate that normal allowance for waste must be made in findings regarding consumption of inputs in the production of the exported product. Paragraph (I) also provides for substitution, where appropriate.

II

In examining whether inputs are consumed in the production of the exported product, as part of a countervailing duty investigation pursuant to this Agreement, investigating authorities should proceed on the following basis:

1. Where it is alleged that an indirect tax rebate scheme, or a drawback scheme, conveys a subsidy by reason of over?rebate or excess drawback of indirect taxes or import charges on inputs consumed in the production of the exported product, the investigating authorities should first determine whether the government of the exporting Member has in place and applies a system or procedure to confirm which inputs are consumed in the production of the exported product and in what amounts. Where such a system or procedure is determined to be applied, the investigating authorities should then examine the system or procedure to see whether it is reasonable, effective for the purpose intended, and based on generally accepted commercial practices in the country of export. The investigating authorities may deem it necessary to carry out, in accordance with paragraph 6 of Article 12, certain practical tests in order to verify information or to satisfy themselves that the system or procedure is being effectively applied.

2. Where there is no such system or procedure, where it is not reasonable, or where it is instituted and considered reasonable but is found not to be applied or not to be applied effectively, a further examination by the exporting Member based on the actual inputs involved would need to be carried out in the context of determining whether an excess payment occurred. If the investigating authorities deemed it necessary, a further examination would be carried out in accordance with paragraph 1.

3. Investigating authorities should treat inputs as physically incorporated if such inputs are used in the production process and are physically present in the product exported. The Members note that an input need not be present in the final product in the same form in which it entered the production process.

4. In determining the amount of a particular input that is consumed in the production of the exported product, a "normal allowance for waste" should be taken into account, and such waste should be treated as consumed in the production of the exported product. The term "waste" refers to that portion of a given input which does not serve an independent function in the production process, is not consumed in the production of the exported product (for reasons such as inefficiencies) and is not recovered, used or sold by the same manufacturer.

5. The investigating authority's determination of whether the claimed allowance for waste is "normal" should take into account the production process, the average experience of the industry in the country of export, and other technical factors, as appropriate. The investigating authority should bear in mind that an important question is whether the authorities in the exporting Member have reasonably calculated the amount of waste, when such an amount is intended to be included in the tax or duty rebate or remission.

*上篇文章: 补贴与反补贴措施协定(英文)19
*下篇文章: 补贴与反补贴措施协定(英文)17
  其他相关文章
  • 大连海关查获史上数量最大盗版光碟案
  • 宁波海关侵权物资不烧掉赠送给民工子弟学校
  • 黄埔检验检疫局现场查验进口废纸夹杂大量生活垃圾
  • 欧盟贸易委员要求对我国纺织品特保调查
  • 中国海关加大知识产权保护
  • 常用纸浆中英文单词对照
  • 常用纸类中英文单词对照
  • 常用画类中英文单词对照
  • 常用工艺品中英文单词对照
  • 常用装饰物、玩具中英文单词对照
  •   海关进出口统计数据
  • 天然橡胶 进出口统计数据/关税税率及相关文章查询
  • 埃塞俄比亚进出口统计数据
  • 有色金属进出口统计数据
  • 一般贸易出口商品统计数据
  • 宁波经济技术开发区进出口统计数据
  • 上海海关进出口统计数据
  • 海南特区进出口统计数据
  • 合成有机染料出口海关统计数据
  • 锯材进口海关统计数据
  • 其他贱金属、金属陶瓷及其制品进出口统计数据
  •   链接导航
    免费入住中国进出口企业黄页
    化工行业进出口化工商品海关编码归类
    2007年最新海关关税税率税则