首頁>海關綜合信息資訊>配額許可貿易壁壘>[本文GB]2007年最新中國海關稅率稅則查詢表
補貼与反補貼措施協定(英文)12
中國海關綜合信息資訊网-海關通關報關咨詢/進出口統計數据關稅查詢
﹛﹛Article 20

Retroactivity

20.1 Provisional measures and countervailing duties shall only be applied to products which enter for consumption after the time when the decision under paragraph 1 of Article 17 and paragraph 1 of Article 19, respectively, enters into force, subject to the exceptions set out in this Article.

20.2 Where a final determination of injury (but not of a threat thereof or of a material retardation of the establishment of an industry) is made or, in the case of a final determination of a threat of injury, where the effect of the subsidized imports would, in the absence of the provisional measures, have led to a determination of injury, countervailing duties may be levied retroactively for the period for which provisional measures, if any, have been applied.

20.3 If the definitive countervailing duty is higher than the amount guaranteed by the cash deposit or bond, the difference shall not be collected. If the definitive duty is less than the amount guaranteed by the cash deposit or bond, the excess amount shall be reimbursed or the bond released in an expeditious manner.

20.4 Except as provided in paragraph 2, where a determination of threat of injury or material retardation is made (but no injury has yet occurred) a definitive countervailing duty may be imposed only from the date of the determination of threat of injury or material retardation, and any cash deposit made during the period of the application of provisional measures shall be refunded and any bonds released in an expeditious manner.

20.5 Where a final determination is negative, any cash deposit made during the period of the application of provisional measures shall be refunded and any bonds released in an expeditious manner.

20.6 In critical circumstances where for the subsidized product in question the authorities find that injury which is difficult to repair is caused by massive imports in a relatively short period of a product benefiting from subsidies paid or bestowed inconsistently with the provisions of GATT 1994 and of this Agreement and where it is deemed necessary, in order to preclude the recurrence of such injury, to assess countervailing duties retroactively on those imports, the definitive countervailing duties may be assessed on imports which were entered for consumption not more than 90 days prior to the date of application of provisional measures.

Article 21

Duration and Review of Countervailing Duties and Undertakings

21.1 A countervailing duty shall remain in force only as long as and to the extent necessary to counteract subsidization which is causing injury.

21.2 The authorities shall review the need for the continued imposition of the duty, where warranted, on their own initiative or, provided that a reasonable period of time has elapsed since the imposition of the definitive countervailing duty, upon request by any interested party which submits positive information substantiating the need for a review. Interested parties shall have the right to request the authorities to examine whether the continued imposition of the duty is necessary to offset subsidization, whether the injury would be likely to continue or recur if the duty were removed or varied, or both. If, as a result of the review under this paragraph, the authorities determine that the countervailing duty is no longer warranted, it shall be terminated immediately.

21.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2, any definitive countervailing duty shall be terminated on a date not later than five years from its imposition (or from the date of the most recent review under paragraph 2 if that review has covered both subsidization and injury, or under this paragraph), unless the authorities determine, in a review initiated before that date on their own initiative or upon a duly substantiated request made by or on behalf of the domestic industry within a reasonable period of time prior to that date, that the expiry of the duty would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of subsidization and injury. The duty may remain in force pending the outcome of such a review.

21.4 The provisions of Article 12 regarding evidence and procedure shall apply to any review carried out under this Article. Any such review shall be carried out expeditiously and shall normally be concluded within 12 months of the date of initiation of the review.

21.5 The provisions of this Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to undertakings accepted under Article 18.

*上篇文章: 補貼与反補貼措施協定(英文)13
*下篇文章: 補貼与反補貼措施協定(英文)11
  其他相關文章
  • 汕頭海關五項改革促外經貿發展
  • 江蘇彩電半數出口美歐
  • 企業期盼出口退稅更加靈活
  • 黃埔檢出436吨不合格廢紙
  • 粵港海關去年查獲案值愈10億
  • 廈門首季紡織品出口增速猛降﹛出口歐美成倍增長
  • 浙江机電產品進出口"冷熱不均"
  • 重慶海關舉行4﹛26知識產權宣傳活動
  • 出口卷煙的免稅最新規定及注意事項
  • 關企合作保護知識產權 廣東分署提供強大支撐
  •   海關進出口統計數据
  • 硬化明膠 進出口統計數据/關稅稅率及相關文章查詢
  • 科特迪瓦共和國進出口統計數据
  • 通用工業机械設備及零件進出口統計數据
  • 加工貿易進口設備出口商品統計數据
  • 蕪湖市進出口統計數据
  • 廈門海關進出口統計數据
  • 保稅區進出口統計數据
  • 美容化妝品及護膚品出口海關統計數据
  • 紡織用合成纖維進口海關統計數据
  • 車輛﹛航空器﹛船舶及運輸設備進出口統計數据
  •   鏈接導航
    免費入住中國進出口企業黃頁
    化工行業進出口化工商品海關編碼歸類
    2007年最新海關關稅稅率稅則