首頁>海關綜合信息資訊>配額許可貿易壁壘>[本文GB]2006年最新中國海關稅率稅則查詢表
補貼与反補貼措施協定(英文)18
中國海關綜合信息資訊网-海關通關報關咨詢/進出口統計數据關稅查詢
﹛﹛ANNEX II

GUIDELINES ON CONSUMPTION OF INPUTS IN THE PRODUCTION PROCESS

I

1. Indirect tax rebate schemes can allow for exemption, remission or deferral of prior?stage cumulative indirect taxes levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product (making normal allowance for waste). Similarly, drawback schemes can allow for the remission or drawback of import charges levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product (making normal allowance for waste).

2. The Illustrative List of Export Subsidies in Annex I of this Agreement makes reference to the term "inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product" in paragraphs (h) and (I). Pursuant to paragraph (h), indirect tax rebate schemes can constitute an export subsidy to the extent that they result in exemption, remission or deferral of prior?stage cumulative indirect taxes in excess of the amount of such taxes actually levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product. Pursuant to paragraph (I), drawback schemes can constitute an export subsidy to the extent that they result in a remission or drawback of import charges in excess of those actually levied on inputs that are consumed in the production of the exported product. Both paragraphs stipulate that normal allowance for waste must be made in findings regarding consumption of inputs in the production of the exported product. Paragraph (I) also provides for substitution, where appropriate.

II

In examining whether inputs are consumed in the production of the exported product, as part of a countervailing duty investigation pursuant to this Agreement, investigating authorities should proceed on the following basis:

1. Where it is alleged that an indirect tax rebate scheme, or a drawback scheme, conveys a subsidy by reason of over?rebate or excess drawback of indirect taxes or import charges on inputs consumed in the production of the exported product, the investigating authorities should first determine whether the government of the exporting Member has in place and applies a system or procedure to confirm which inputs are consumed in the production of the exported product and in what amounts. Where such a system or procedure is determined to be applied, the investigating authorities should then examine the system or procedure to see whether it is reasonable, effective for the purpose intended, and based on generally accepted commercial practices in the country of export. The investigating authorities may deem it necessary to carry out, in accordance with paragraph 6 of Article 12, certain practical tests in order to verify information or to satisfy themselves that the system or procedure is being effectively applied.

2. Where there is no such system or procedure, where it is not reasonable, or where it is instituted and considered reasonable but is found not to be applied or not to be applied effectively, a further examination by the exporting Member based on the actual inputs involved would need to be carried out in the context of determining whether an excess payment occurred. If the investigating authorities deemed it necessary, a further examination would be carried out in accordance with paragraph 1.

3. Investigating authorities should treat inputs as physically incorporated if such inputs are used in the production process and are physically present in the product exported. The Members note that an input need not be present in the final product in the same form in which it entered the production process.

4. In determining the amount of a particular input that is consumed in the production of the exported product, a "normal allowance for waste" should be taken into account, and such waste should be treated as consumed in the production of the exported product. The term "waste" refers to that portion of a given input which does not serve an independent function in the production process, is not consumed in the production of the exported product (for reasons such as inefficiencies) and is not recovered, used or sold by the same manufacturer.

5. The investigating authority's determination of whether the claimed allowance for waste is "normal" should take into account the production process, the average experience of the industry in the country of export, and other technical factors, as appropriate. The investigating authority should bear in mind that an important question is whether the authorities in the exporting Member have reasonably calculated the amount of waste, when such an amount is intended to be included in the tax or duty rebate or remission.

*上篇文章: 補貼与反補貼措施協定(英文)19
*下篇文章: 補貼与反補貼措施協定(英文)17
  其他相關文章
  • 烏克蘭進口保障措施實施法1
  • 土庫曼斯坦海關稅率
  • 坦桑尼亞海關關稅及通關程序
  • 日本的進口通關手續
  • 約旦海關監管制度及通關程序
  • 伊朗伊斯蘭共和國海關法5
  • 伊朗伊斯蘭共和國海關法4
  • 伊朗伊斯蘭共和國海關法3
  • 伊朗伊斯蘭共和國海關法2
  • 伊朗伊斯蘭共和國海關法1
  •   海關進出口統計數据
  • 天然橡膠 進出口統計數据/關稅稅率及相關文章查詢
  • 埃塞俄比亞進出口統計數据
  • 有色金屬進出口統計數据
  • 一般貿易出口商品統計數据
  • 宁波經濟技術開發區進出口統計數据
  • 上海海關進出口統計數据
  • 海南特區進出口統計數据
  • 合成有机染料出口海關統計數据
  • 鋸材進口海關統計數据
  • 其他賤金屬﹛金屬陶瓷及其制品進出口統計數据
  •   鏈接導航
    免費入住中國進出口企業黃頁
    化工行業進出口化工商品海關編碼歸類
    2006年最新海關關稅稅率稅則,2004年舊版稅率